WHEN EMPLOYEES CROSS THE LINE ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Novelist Martin Amis told Radio
4 recently that he doesn’t ‘do’ social media. Most of us however can’t avoid
it. For businesses certainly, it seems the most effective way to promote a
brand is through social media tools like Linked In, Facebook and Twitter.
But what happens when employees cross the
line and post material that is defamatory in some way?
It’s well established that
someone can be libelled online – on Twitter and elsewhere. Back in 2012 in the
first ‘Twitter libel’ case in England, the New Zealand cricketer Chris Cairns
was awarded £90,000 after false allegations that he was involved in
match-fixing.
So whether content is damaging
to a third party, for example a commercial competitor or whether an individual
employee posts material that defames his or her employer, it’s clear that
unfettered access to social media channels presents a risk. At Big Data Law we
help businesses reduce their legal exposure through carefully planned and tailor-made advice.
‘THESE VIEWS ARE MY OWN’ – A
DISCLAIMER THAT WON’T ALWAYS WORK
Disclaimers on social media
accounts like ‘views are my own’ or ‘not the views of my employer’ are good
practice. But they will not in most cases protect an employer from claims
arising from posts made by employees in the course of their employment that are
defamatory or otherwise unlawful. That’s because employers can be deemed to be
vicariously liable for the actions of their employees. Admittedly, even in
small and medium-sized organisations it’s difficult to keep tabs on the way
individual employees behave on social media. But companies must anticipate the
risk and be ready to deal with the fallout from ill-judged posts when they do
occur.
THREAT FROM WITHIN? EMPLOYEE
ATTACKS ON SOCIAL MEDIA
When a disgruntled employee
posts defamatory material about the company the reputational and financial
stakes are high. But issuing defamation proceedings takes time and there is no
guarantee of success. The bar is set high for companies seeking to prove
defamation. For example, it’s necessary to satisfy a number of tests, including
that the complained of material will harm your reputation in the eyes of ‘right
thinking members of society’ and that it is likely to seriously harm your
reputation.
In addition, the employee may
have a good case for posting the material – if the content is true, for example
or there is a public interest-type defence.
In many cases the damage caused
by defamatory material may be done before you get anywhere near court.
It’s important therefore to have
measures in place to deal with the possibility that an employee will post
harmful material about your business. Be ready to approach websites directly to
ascertain whether it’s possible to remove the material immediately and to
immediately send a formal ‘cease and desist’ letter to the employee or
ex-employee.
PUTTING SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES IN
PLACE
To deal with these threats it is
essential to have proper policies and procedures in place. Not only will
visible policies lead to greater staff awareness of how to behave on social
media, they will also demonstrate that a company has taken reasonable steps to
prevent unlawful or defamatory activity. This will be crucial when attempting
to defend any claim from a third party and prove useful in any employment
tribunal case.
Bodies such as ACAS
provide general online guides to the implementation of social media
policies in the workplace. Big Data Law helps businesses put in place
tailor-made measures that are appropriate to the individual business.
Company-specific measures can be persuasive in demonstrating that you have
taken the risk to your clients and third parties of unlawful social media
material seriously. Policies will usually include provisions relating to:
·
The
ability of the company to monitor emails and social media accounts
·
The
type of behaviour that is permissible on social media
·
Prohibited
behaviour
·
The
amendment to policies to ensure compliance with new developments
·
Training
of key staff in relevant defamation and copyright legislation
The current level of social
media engagement across all business sectors means it is impractical to monitor
every posting by individual employees. But by taking the kind of proactive
measures described and putting in place a crisis management plan to deal with
the publication of material that’s of an unlawful or defamatory nature it is
possible to mitigate against major organisational damage.
To
discuss how a comprehensive social media policy can protect your business you
can contact social media security solicitors at Big Data
Law or call on +44 (0) 7545 813 894.


Comments
Post a Comment